Gemini source and answer review

Define the experience we are checking

We name the product, displayed model or mode, locale and date before interpreting an answer. Gemini Apps, Google AI Mode and developer API experiments do not share a single report of your business’s visibility.

For AI Mode in Google Search, review Googlebot access, indexing/preview rules and the Search Console generative setting. Google: Search generative AI control. For Gemini grounding and specified training uses, review Google-Extended; changes require an informed owner decision. Google: Common crawler controls.

A useful observation package

• An agreed set of branded, unbranded and policy questions.
• The exact prompts, product context and cited URLs.
• Fact checks against approved business sources.
• A correction list for source conflicts or unanswered buying questions.
• Clear labels for unavailable evidence and limited samples.

A direct-URL question is labeled as retrieval assistance. It is not counted as independent discovery. Repeated observations help reveal variability; they do not establish a permanent ranking.

Keep the outcome concrete

We can improve the source pages you control and document the resulting tests. We do not sell a universal “Gemini business registration” or promise a particular answer. If merchant features are relevant, we scope their eligibility and data separately.

Bring the customer decisions you want the review to address. A specific question about service suitability or policy accuracy is more useful than a single blended AI score.

Best starting input: Bring the buying questions you want tested and the current source pages. We agree the question count, product context and repeat observations. Discuss the scope with Alex.